Made Fitri Padmi



The post-Cold War era has seen the expansion of involvement by non-state actors in the spreading of liberal peace principles. NGOs are one of the non-state actors which have been actively advocating the value of liberal peace. This paper would like to analyze the role of NGOs in spreading the value of peace throughout the world. The paper began in the concern of the rising number of civilian casualties during armed conflicts. This paper examines liberal peace as a pathway to global improvement and as a source of sustainable peace. NGOs take the grassroots approach to views of conflict, peacebuilding, development, and promoting liberal values by involving the local community and local authority. NGOs emerge to fill the gap of liberal peacebuilding projects that cannot be reached by the state. The legally-mandated neutrality of NGOs gives them more access to build peace as they are seen as less threatening parties. Despite the criticism of NGOs as the vehicle of state interests, NGOs are able to be good partners for the state to establish liberal peace. The case study of NGO involvement in Afghanistan describes how NGOs work to protect human rights, empower communities, and other humanitarian projects.

Keywords: NGOs, liberal peace, democracy, peacebuilding


Era pasca-Perang Dingin telah menjadi saksi bagi perluasan keterlibatan aktor-aktor non-negara dalam penyebaran prinsip-prinsip perdamaian liberal. NGO adalah salah satu aktor non-negara yang telah secara aktif menganjurkan nilai perdamaian liberal. Tulisan ini ingin menganalisis peran NGO dalam menyebarkan nilai perdamaian di seluruh dunia. Tulisan ini mulai menjadi perhatian meningkatnya jumlah korban sipil selama konflik bersenjata. Penelitian ini mengkaji perdamaian liberal sebagai jalur menuju perbaikan global dan sebagai sumber perdamaian yang berkelanjutan. NGO mengambil pendekatan akar rumput untuk melihat konflik, pembangunan perdamaian, pembangunan, dan mempromosikan nilai-nilai liberal dengan melibatkan masyarakat lokal dan pemerintah daerah. NGO muncul untuk mengisi kesenjangan proyek pembangunan perdamaian liberal yang tidak dapat dicapai oleh negara. Azas netralitas yang diamanatkan pada NGO memberi mereka lebih banyak akses untuk membangun perdamaian karena dipandang sebagai pihak yang kurang mengancam. Meskipun ada kritik terhadap NGO sebagai alat bagi kepentingan negara, NGO dapat menjadi mitra yang baik bagi negara untuk mewujudkan perdamaian liberal. Studi kasus keterlibatan NGO di Afghanistan menggambarkan bagaimana NGO bekerja untuk melindungi hak asasi manusia, memberdayakan masyarakat, dan proyek kemanusiaan lainnya.

Kata kunci: NGO, perdamaian liberal, demokrasi, peacebuilding

Full Text:



Barash, D.P. ed., 2000. Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barash, D.P., 1991. International Law. In: Barash, ed., 2000. Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.106-107.

Bebbington, A.J., Hickey, S. and Mitlin, D.C., ed., 2008. Can NGOs Make a Difference? The Challenge of Development Alternatives. London: Zed Books.

Ceadel, M., 1987. Thinking about Peace and War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Christie, R., 2013. Peacebuilding and NGOs: State-Civil Society Interaction. Oxon: Routledge.

Clayton, A., ed., 1994. Governance, Democracy & Conditionality: The Role for NGOs?. Oxford: Intract.

Davidson, J. 2012. Humanitarian Intervention as Liberal Imperialism: A Force for Good?. POLIS Journal [e-journal] 7, 128-164. Available at [accessed 6 January 2015]

Doyle, M.W., 2005. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. American Political Science Review [e-journal] 99(3), 463-466. Available at [accessed 2 January 2015]

Duffield, M., 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.

Duffield, M., 2007. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of People. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Edwards, M. and Hulme, D., ed., 1996. Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post-Cold War World. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

Galtung, J., Jacobsen, C.G. and Brand-Jacobsen, K.F., 2002. Searching for Peace: The Road to TRANSCEND. London: Pluto Press.

Gerstbauer, L.C., 2005. The New Conflict Managers: Peacebuilding, NGOs and State Agendas. In: Krahman, E. ed., 2005. New Threats and New Actors in International Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Grigat, S., 2014. Educating into Liberal Peace: the International Crisis Group’s Contribution to an Emerging Global Governmentality. Third World Quarterly [e-journal] 35(4), 563-580. Available at [accessed 2 January 2015]

Gusber, P., 2002. The Impact of NGOs on State and Non-state Relation in the Middle East. Middle East Policy [e-journal] 9(1), 139-148. Available at> [accessed 5 January 2015]

Helton, A.C., 2002. Rescuing the Refugees. Foreign Affairs [e-journal] 81(2), 71-82. Available at [accessed 5 January 2015]

Jennings, J., 1994. Rousseau, Social Contract and the Modern Leviathan. In: D. Boucher and P. Kelly, ed. 1994. The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls. London: Routledge. Ch.6.

Joshi, M., Lee S.Y. and Ginty, R.M., 2014. Just How Liberal Peace is Liberal Peace?. International Peacekeeping [e-journal] 21(3), 364-389. Available at [accessed 2 January 2015]

Kant, E., 1785. Perpetual Peace. In: D.P. Barash, ed., 2000. Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.122-125.

Krahman, E. ed., 2005. New Threats and New Actors in International Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kriesberg, L., 1997. Social Movements and Global Transformation. In: J. Smith, C. Chatfield and R. Pagnucco, ed. 1997. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity beyond the State. New York: Syracuse University Press. Ch.1.

Lee, S.Y. and Ginty, R.M., 2012. Context and Postconflict Referendum. National and Ethnic Politics [e-journal] 18(1), 43-64. Available at [accessed 5 January 2015]

Lindenberg, M. and Bryant, C., 2001. Going Global: Transforming Relief and Development NGOs. Connecticut: Kumarian Press.

Mawlawi, F., 1993. New Conflicts, New Challenges: The Evolving Role for Non-governmental Actors. Journal of International Affairs [e-journal] 46(2), 391-413. Available at> [accessed 6 January 2015]

Miklian, J., 2014. Tha Past, Present and Future of the ‘Liberal Peace’. Strategic Analysis [e-journal] 38(4), 493-507. Available at {accessed 3 January 2015]

Monshipouri, M. 2003. NGOs and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan. In: In: H.F. Carey and O.P. Richmond, ed. 2003. Mitigating Conflict: The Role of NGOs. London: Fank Cass.

Richmond, O.P., 2006. The Problem of Peace: Understanding the ‘Liberal Peace’. Conflict, Security & Development [e-journal] 6(3), 291-314. Available at [accessed 2 January 2015]

Russet, B., 1993. Can Democratic Peace be Built?. International Interaction [e-journal] 18(3), 277-282. Available at [accessed 2 January 2015]

Schloms, M. 2003. Humanitarian NGOs in Peace Process. In: H.F. Carey and O.P. Richmond, ed. 2003. Mitigating Conflict: The Role of NGOs. London: Fank Cass.

Selby, J., 2013. The Myth of Liberal Peacebuilding. Conflict Security & Development [e-journal] 13(1), 57-86. Available at [accessed 26 December 2014]

UN, 2000. Peacebuilding & the United Nations. Available at [accessed 3 January 2015]

UNDP, 1994. Human Development Report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at [accessed 22 December 2014]



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Editorial Office of Global Insight Journal:

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Gedung UTA'45 Jakarta Lantai 5

Jl. Sunter Permai Raya, Jakarta 14350