Penunjang Pengungkapan Fraud dan Moderasi Profesionalisme pada Auditorat Utama Investigasi BPK RI

Juslen Justinus Sihombing, Sihar Tambun

Abstract


This study aims to examine the effect of forensic accounting, investigative audit, and competence on fraud disclosure with professionalism as a moderating variable (Case Study on the Directorate General of Investigative Unit, The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia). The research was conducted using quantitative methods where primary data and selection of respondents based on purposive sampling with the criteria that examiners at the Directorate General of Investigative Unit, The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (1) have conducted investigative examinations, (2) have conducted investigative examinations in the context of calculating state losses (3) fulfilling education and training hours per year at the Directorate General of Investigative Unit, The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia. This study used a sample of 126 respondents who were auditors at the Directorate General of Investigative Unit, The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia. The data processed comes from a survey in the form of questionnaire answers from respondents from May 28 - June 5, 2024. The answers to the questionnaire that became the final sample amounted to 124 answers to the questionnaire from the Auditor at the Directorate General of Investigative Unit. The research results (1) forensic accounting variables have a positive effect on fraud disclosure, (2) investigative audit variables have a positive effect on fraud disclosure, (3) competency variables have a positive effect on fraud disclosure, (4) professionalism variables cannot strengthen the effect of forensic accounting on fraud disclosure, (5) professionalism variables cannot strengthen the influence of investigative audits on fraud disclosure, (6) professionalism variables can strengthen the effect of competence on fraud disclosure. Research contributes to the literature in the fields of forensic accounting, and investigative auditing and suggests to auditors to increase competence in disclosing fraud.

References


Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. (2015). Partial Least Square (PLS) : Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2015.

Achyarsyah, P., & Rani, M. (2020). Pengaruh Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif Terhadap Pengungkapan Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan (Studi pada Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, Volume 18(Juli 2020).

Andini, S., Amiruddin, & Pontoh, G. T. (2021). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Tekanan Waktu Auditor Investigatif terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. Akrual: Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi Kontemporer, Vol. 14(No. 2), 151–162.

Andriani, A., Rahmawati, R., & Kasran, M. (2020). Pengaruh Akuntansi Forensik Dan Audit Investigasi Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud (Studi pada Kantor BPKP di Kota Makassar).

Anggraini, D., Triharyati, E., & Novita, H. A. (2019). Akuntansi Forensik Dan Audit Investigatif Dalam Pengungkapan Fraud. Costing: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, Volume 2(Nomor 2), 372–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v2i2.708

Ardiansyah, S. S. (2023). Pengaruh Whistleblowing, Akuntansi Forensik Dan Audit Investigasi Dalam Mendeteksi Fraud (Studi Pada Perwakilan BPKP Provinsi Riau). Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Auditing, Vol. 19(No. 2). jkaa.bunghatta.ac.id

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Ini Tata Cara Tugas Pemeriksaan Investigatif dan Penghitungan Kerugian Negara BPK. Wartapemeriksa.Bpk.Go.Id. https://wartapemeriksa.bpk.go.id/?p=40915

Chandrarin, G. (2017). Metode Riset Akuntansi: Pendekatan Akuntansi (Cet. 2). Salemba Empat.

Cressey, D. R. (1950). The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust. American Sociological Review, 16(4).

Dianto, A. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntansi Forensik, Audit Investigatif, Professional Judgment, dan Whistleblower terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Neraca, 1(2), 11–23. https://ejournal.amirulbangunbangsapublishing.com/index.php/JAN/article/view/7

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (Edisi 8). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2012). Partial Least Square: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Smart PLS 2.0 M3 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares Konsep Teknik dan Aplikasi dengan Program Smart PLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2017). Partial Least Square: Konsep, Metode, dan Aplikasi menggunakan program WarpPLS 5.0 (Edisi ke-3). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro.

Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in Second Language and Education Research: Guidelines Using an Applied Example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. A Workbook. Cham: Springer.

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. In European Business Review (Vol. 26, Issue 2).

Hamilah, H., Denny, D., & Handayani, E. (2019). The Effect Of Professional Education, Experience And Independence On The Ability Of Internal Auditors In Detecting Fraud In The Pharmaceutical Industry Company In Central Jakarta. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(5), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.8602

Hasbi, A. S. E. (2019). Pengaruh Audit Forensik, Audit Investigatif, Dan Professional Judgment Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud Dengan Kecerdasan Spiritual Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Perwakilan BPKP Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan). Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Isalam UIN Alaudin Makassar.

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

Ikhtiari, K., & Nurfadila. (2022). Penerapan Skeptisme Profesional dan Audit Investigasi Terhadap Keberhasilan Pengungkapan Fraud pada Kantor Inspektorat Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Seiko : Journal of Management & Business, 4(3), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v4i3.2497

Ismanda, R. M., Sukarmanto, E., & Hernawati, N. (2021). Pengaruh Audit Investigasi, Akuntan Forensik dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. Prosiding Akuntansi. https://doi.org/10.29313/.v7i1.27116

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, V. 3(No. 4), 305–360.

Kristanti, O., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Literature Review: Pengaruh Audit Forensik, Audit Investigatif, Dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. Sentri: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Vol. 1, No(November 2022).

Kuntadi, C., Isnaini, S. F. R., & Pramukty, R. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntansi Forensik, Audit Investigatif, Independensi, Dan Skeptisme Profesional Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Volume 2(No. 1 (Januari 2023).).

Kuntadi, C., & Limbong, T. E. (2022). Faktor-faktor Yang Memengaruhi Pengungkapan Fraud: Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Audit Investigatif, Skeptisme Profesional. Journal of Comprehensive Science, Vol. 1 No.(November 2022).

Larasati, D., Andreas, A., & Rofika, R. (2020). Pengaruh Teknik Audit Investigatif, Pengalaman Auditor Dan Profesionalisme Auditor Terhadap Pengungkapan Kecurangan Dengan Kecerdasan Spiritual sebagai Pemoderasi. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, Vol. 1, No(Maret 2020), 150–169.

Lestari, H., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan: Akuntansi Forensik, Audit Investigatif Dan Data Mining. Sentri: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Vol. 1, No(November 2022).

Lutfi, M., Mas’ud, M., & Rahim, S. (2023). Pengaruh Audit Forensik, Audit Investigatif, dan Professional Judgment Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud Pada Kantor BPKP Perwakilan Sulawesi Selatan. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, Volume 6(Issue 2), 459–478. www.acfe.com/fraud-tree.aspx

Maharani, T., & Meiliana, D. (2021). Ketua BPK: Kerugian Negara dalam Kasus Korupsi Asabri Rp 22,78 Triliun. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/05/31/15130941/ketua-bpk-kerugian-negara-dalam-kasus-korupsi-asabri-rp-2278-triliun

Makhmuro, A., & Nurcahya, A. Y. (2023). Literature Review Of Audit Investigation Role And Whistleblowing System In Efforts To Fraud Disclosure. Current Advanced Research On Sharia Finance And Economic Worldwide (Cashflow), Vol. 2(Issue 2), 360–365. https://ojs.transpublika.com/index.php/CASHFLOW/

Meiryani, M., Sampelino, Y. R., Witjaksono, A., Sihotang, P., Anwar, Y., & Mulyadi, M. S. (2023). The Role of Information Technology in the Practice of Forensic Investigation Analysis for Fraud Disclosure in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 388. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338803002

Newman, W., Tshuma, Z., & Sitsha, L. (2023). An Analysis of Effects of Forensic Auditing in Detecting Fraud in State Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of ZESA. Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies (JAFAS). https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2023.025

Nufus, W. H. (2020). Kerugian Negara Rp 16,81 T, Skandal Jiwasraya Dikebut Segera Sidang. News.Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4931507/kerugian-negara-rp-16-81-t-skandal-jiwasraya-dikebut-segera-sidang

Oyerogba, E. O. (2021). Forensic Auditing Mechanism and Fraud Detection: The Case of Nigerian Public Sector. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(5), 752–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-04-2020-0072

Pamungkas, W., & Jaeni, J. (2022). Pengaruh Akuntansi Forensik, Audit Investigatif, Independensi, dan Skeptisme Profesional Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud (Studi Pada BPKP Perwakilan Jawa Tengah). Kompak: Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, Vol. 15(No. 1 (Juli 2022)), 99–109. http://journal.stekom.ac.id/index.php/kompakpage99

Peraturan BPK RI. (2017). Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara.

Pramesti, D., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Literatur Review: Pengaruh Akuntansi Forensik, Audit Investigatif, Dan Independensi Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. Jurnal Economina, Volume 1(Nomor 3 November 2022).

Purwadarminta, W. J. S. (2014). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Tiga). Balai Pustaka.

Putri, C. M., & Wahyundaru, S. D. (2020). Penerapan Pengendalian Intern, Audit Investigatif, Pengalaman, Profesionalisme, dan Akuntansi Forensik Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud (Studi Kasus pada Inspektorat Provinsi Jawa Tengah). Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) 3. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, 28 Oktober 2020.

Ramadhan, A., Nugraheny, D. E., & Farisa, F. C. (2022). Jokowi: Pemberantasan Korupsi Jadi Prioritas Utama Pemerintah. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/08/16/11172231/jokowi-pemberantasan-korupsi-jadi-prioritas-utama-pemerintah

Ratih, I. D. A. C. N., & Sisdyani, E. A. (2023). Audit Forensik, Audit Investigasi, dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Pengungkapan Kecurangan di BPKP. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, Vol. 33(No. 1), 145. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i01.p11

Razaee, Z., & Riley, R. (2010). Financial Statement Fraud Prevention and Detection 2nd Editon (2nd Editon). Published by John Wilay & Sons, Inc.

Rifani, R. A., & Hasan, H. (2022). Disclosure of Fraud Through Forensic Accounting, Audit Investigation and Auditor Professionalism. Jurnal Economic Resource, 5(2).

Saridewi, F. L., Lannai, D., Bakri, A., & Pramukti, A. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Skeptisme Profesional Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. Center of Economic Student Journal, Vol. 5(No. 2, April 2022). https://makassar.tribunnews.com

Sinaga, E. I., & Rahmah, M. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntansi Forensik Dan Audit Investigasi Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud Pelaporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Daerah Jakarta Selatan). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Krisnadwipayana, Volume 10(Nomor 1, Januari-April 2023).

Sudarmadi, D. (2023). Forensic Accounting and Investigative Audit on the Effectiveness of Implementing Audit Procedures in Fraud Disclosure. JASa (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit Dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi), Vol. 7(No. 2 Agustus 2023), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.36555/jasa.v7i2.2350

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.

Suratman, A., & Triana, M. (2021). Audit Forensik: Konsep dan Implementasi. PT Mandala Nasional.

Sutedi, A. (2009). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Dan Berbagai Permasalahannya. Sinar Grafika.

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2017). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif (Edisi 2). Salemba Empat.

Tunggal, A. W. (2013). Dasar-dasar Fraud Auditing. Harvarindo.

Wahyuni, M. (2020). Statistik Deskriptif Untuk Penelitian Olah Data Manual Dan SPSS Versi 25. Bintang Pustaka Madani Yogyakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/jam.v9i1.7904

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.