Peran Literasi Keuangan Dalam Memoderasi Pengaruh Effort Expectancy, Pengaruh Sosial, dan Performance Expectancy Terhadap Penggunaan Sistem Pembayaran Non-Tunai (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Akuntansi Kota Semarang)

Erni Dewi Fitriani, Hardiwinoto Hardiwinoto, Fatmasari Sukesti

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the influence of Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Performance Expectancy on the use of non-cash payment systems, as well as the role of Financial Literacy as a moderating variable. The background of this study is the rapid development of financial technology (fintech) in Indonesia, which has driven a significant increase in electronic money transactions. Using a quantitative approach and the Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) method, data were collected through questionnaires from 396 undergraduate Accounting students in Semarang City. Data analysis used the SPSS Statistics 26 program. The results showed that Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Performance Expectancy had a positive and significant influence on the use of non-cash payment systems. However, Financial Literacy was found to be unable to moderate the relationship between the three variables and system usage. This indicates that ease of use, social encouragement, and practical benefits are more dominant in driving technology adoption than the level of user financial literacy. These results provide insights for service providers to focus on the aspects of ease and practical benefits in their product development strategies.


Keywords


Effort Expectancy; Social Influence; Performance Expectancy; Financial Literacy; Use of Non-Cash Payment

References


Alomari, A. S. A., & Abdullah, N. L. (2023). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to use Cryptocurrency among Saudi Arabian public university students: Moderating role of financial literacy. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2178092

Bemby, F. A. W., & Qomariyah, A. (2023). Does Financial Literacy Matter in Cashless Payment Usage? Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 25(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.25.2.117-128

Bhuiyan, M. R. I., Akter, M. S., & Islam, S. (2024). How does digital payment transform society as a cashless society? An empirical study in the developing economy. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2023-0170

Chan, R., Troshani, I., Rao Hill, S., & Hoffmann, A. (2022). Towards an understanding of consumers’ FinTech adoption: the case of Open Banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 886–917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0397

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gulo, I. P., & Khoiri, M. (2024). Pengaruh Kemudahan, Fitur Layanan, Dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan E-Wallet Dana Di Kota Batam. In YUME : Journal of Management (Vol. 7, Number 3).

Hung, D. N., Tham, J., Azam, S. M. F., & Khatibi, A. A. (2019). An Empirical Analysis of Perceived Transaction Convenience, Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy and Behavior Intention to Mobile Payment of Cambodian Users. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 11(4), 77. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v11n4p77

Irhamni, M. A. F. (2024, October 20). Nilai Transaksi Transfer Uang Elektronik Indonesia Capai Rp303 Triliun di 2024. Good Stats.

Laksono, T. B., & Mangifera, L. (2024). Manajemen dan Bisnis Peran Social Influence Dalam Memoderasi Mobile Self Efficacy, Performance Expectancy Effort Expectancy Terhadap Behavior Intention E-Wallet Pada UMKM Di Daerah Wisata Telaga Sarangan. In Manajemen dan Bisnis (Vol. 6, Number 1). https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/MdB

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5

Pratama, S. (2024). Pengaruh Social Influence Dan Keamanan Terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan Dengan Literasi Keuangan Digital Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. repository.uinsaizu.ac.id

Probowulan, D. (2022). The Sustainability of Pervasive Learning in Accounting Education: Strategy in the Transition of “Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka.” Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 24(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.24.1.24−33

Ramadhan, D., Asri, R. H., Gisijanto, A. H., Hartanti, D. N., & Setyarini, E. (2023). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan, Persepsi Manfaat, Gaya Hidup dan LiterasiKeuangan Digital Terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan QRIS pada GenerasiMuda. Lentera Bisnis Manajemen, 01. https://lenteranusa.id/

Rooij, M. Van, Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2007). Financial Literacy and Stock Market Participation. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13565

Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2017). Determining students’ behavioural intention to use animation and storytelling applying the UTAUT model: The moderating roles of gender and experience level. International Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.10.002

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wardani, V. K., Wardoyo, C., & Wulandari, D. (2022). Investigasi variabel-variabel yang memengaruhi minat penggunaan QRIS oleh mahasiswa: financial literacy sebagai variabel moderasi. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jim

Wardani, V. K., Wardoyo, C., & Wulandari, D. (2024). Investigasi variabel-variabel yang memengaruhi minat penggunaan QRIS oleh mahasiswa: financial literacy sebagai variabel moderasi. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jim

Widayat, W., Masudin, I., & Satiti, N. R. (2020). E-Money payment: Customers’ adopting factors and the implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC6030057

Xue, R., Gepp, A., O’Neill, T. J., Stern, S., & Vanstone, B. J. (2021). Financial literacy and financial strategies: The mediating role of financial concerns. Australian Journal of Management, 46(3), 437–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220940762




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/jam.v11i1.9417

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats