ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN SISTEM INFORMASI MANAJEMEN PROYEK BERBASIS FREE OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE (FOSS) PADA PERUSAHAAN BERSKALA BESAR DI KABUPATEN BEKASI (STUDI KASUS: GOOGLE SPREADSHEET)

Irvan Wiradinata

Abstract


Penggunaan sistem informasi teknologi (ICT) dalam suatu proyek akan sangat membantu kolaborasi dari para stakeholder internal persuahaan tersebut. Free Open-Source Software (FOSS) merupakan sebuah software yang dapat digunakan secara gratis oleh para penggunanya. Penelitian ini akan menganalisa Google Spreadsheet yang merupakan salah satu bentuk FOSS yang diberikan oleh provider Google. PT Intan Prima Kalorindo (Kalorindo), perusahaan manufaktur Heat Exchanger dan Pressure Vessel yang berlokasi di Jalan Tekno Raya B1-F, Kawasan Industri Jababeka III, Cikarang, Kabupaten Bekasi, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, merupakan perusahaan berskala besar. Dalam komunikasi internal di Kalorindo menggunakan Google Spreadsheet untuk beberapa hal sebagai berikut: (1) merencanakan pembelian barang dan jasa; (2) monitoring pembelian barang; (3) monitoring cost control proyek; (4) monitoring jadwal pelaksanaan proyek; dan (5) monitoring keuangan proyek. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode sebagai berikut: (1) Studi literatur digunakan sebagai kerangka teori terkait pemanfaatan sistem informasi (Google Spreadsheet) dalam manajemen prooyek; (2) Online ethnography, dan (3) Observasi dilakukan dalam kurun waktu tiga bulan untuk melihat bagaimana interaksi, komunikasi dan kolaborasi yang terjadi dalam pelaksanaan pemanfaatan FOSS. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa FOSS dalam hal ini Google Spreadsheet dapat menjadi solusi yang sangat kompetitif dari sisi biaya untuk melakukan interaksi, komunikasi dan kolaborasi secara efektif dan efisien.

Keywords


free open-source software, google spreadsheet, komunikasi proyek, kolaborasi, manajemen proyek

Full Text:

PDF

References


B. Llorens and R. Viñoles-Cebolla, “The Influence of the Use of Project Management Tools and Techniques on the Achieved Success,” 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-54410-2_12.

A. M. Pereira, R. Q. Gonçalves, C. G. von Wangenheim, and L. Buglione, “Comparison of open source tools for project management,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, 2013, doi: 10.1142/S0218194013500046.

K. Periyasamy and J. Chianelli, “A project tracking tool for scrum projects with machine learning support for cost estimation,” in EPiC Series in Computing, 2021, vol. 76. doi: 10.29007/6vwh.

T. Ferreira, J. Gutiérrez-Artacho, and J. Bernardino, “Freemium project management tools: Asana, freedcamp and ace project,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2018, vol. 745. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_100.

J. Samáková, D. Babčanová, H. Hrablikchovanová, J. Mesárošová, and J. Šujanová, “Using the Communication Methods, Tools and Support During Management of Project Communication in Industrial Manufacturing Enterprises,” Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, vol. 25, no. 41, 2017, doi: 10.1515/rput-2017-0021.

E. J. Umble, R. R. Haft, and M. M. Umble, “Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 146, no. 2, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00547-7.

PMI Global Standard, “A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge Guide, 6th Edition,” in Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017.

J. Kostalova, L. Tetrevova, and J. Svedik, “Support of Project Management Methods by Project Management Information System,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 210, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.333.

F. M. Elbahri, O. Ismael Al-Sanjary, M. A. M. Ali, Z. Ali Naif, O. A. Ibrahim, and M. N. Mohammed, “Difference Comparison of SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft Solutions Based on Cloud ERP Systems: A Review,” in Proceedings - 2019 IEEE 15th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications, CSPA 2019, 2019. doi: 10.1109/CSPA.2019.8695976.

S. Prasad and S. Tanase, “Competition, collaboration and organization design,” J Econ Behav Organ, vol. 183, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.010.

J. F. de Medeiros, G. Vidor, and A. L. Korzenowski, “Review of experimental methods to optimise the collaboration between organisations in the new product development process,” International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 15, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2018.090463.

A. Steiber, “Technology management: Corporate-startup co-location and how to measure the effects,” Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.4067/s0718-27242020000200011.

B. Latour, “On actor-network theory: A few clarifications,” 1996.

B. Latour, “Social Theory and the Study of Computerized Work Sites,” 1996.

E. Hofvenschioeld and M. Khodadadi, “Communication in futures studies: A discursive analysis of the literature,” Futures, vol. 115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102493.

A. Caliandro, “Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments,” J Contemp Ethnogr, vol. 47, no. 5, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0891241617702960.

D. Murthy, “Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research,” Sociology, vol. 42, no. 5. 2008. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094565.

K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A design science research methodology for information systems research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, 2007, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.

A. Adeniran, J. Mastho, and N. Beacham, “An appraisal of a collaboration-metric model based on text discourse,” in CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2019, vol. 2501.

H. Benbya, G. Passiante, and N. A. Belbaly, “Corporate portal: A tool for knowledge management synchronization,” Int J Inf Manage, vol. 24, no. 3, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2003.12.012.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/jkte.v8i1.6647

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.