LAND MANAGEMENT IN YOGYAKARTA SPECIAL REGION

Muhammad Iqbal, Vindhi Putri Pratiwi

Abstract


DIY As a special autonomous region, it has the right to manage land in DIY where not everyone can directly patent land in DIY. Land management in DIY sometimes becomes polemic for the community. The research method carried out is a qualitative method. Data collection techniques in this study were interviews with relevant stakeholders such as the Department of Land and Spatial DIY and the National Land Agency of the DIY and literature study, namely data collection using various literature and legal documents governing land management in DIY. Land management which is divided into two previously mentioned, namely Keprabon Land and Non-Keprabon Land or Dede Keprabon which are found in all regions in DIY. The Sultanate and the Pakualaman of Pakualaman are legal subjects for land ownership in DIY. Besides, the Sultanate is also given the authority to be able to manage the land of Keprabon and non-Keprabon land in DIY. In this case, all forms of management, use of private land, all kinds of business, social, legal and others have been regulated through Article 33 Paragraph (4) of the Privileges Law. Special Autonomy makes this area has rights to land management where DIY has four boundaries divided into Sultan Ground (SG) land, Pakualaman Ground (PG), village land and DIY land. The granting of authority over the use of Sultanate land and Pakualaman land is carried out following applicable legal provisions, namely according to customary law.


Keywords


Land Management, Sultan Ground, Pakualaman Ground, Yogyakarta Special Region

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Annafie, K., & Nurmandi, A. (2016). Kelembagaan otonomi khusus (otsus) dalam mempertahankan nilai-nilai kebudayaan di provinsi daerah istimewa yogyakarta. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, Vol.3 No.2(304–338).

Arto, S. (2016). Quo Vadis Otonomi Pertanahan Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Kertha Patrika, 38(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.24843/kp.2016.v38.i01.p06

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 2, 45-68

Dwiyansany, S., & Wardhani, L. T. A. L. (2019). Sistem Pertanahan Keraton Yogyakarta Sebagai Daerah Otonomi Khusus. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 226–236.

Hasim, R. (2016). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Sultan Ground Dalam Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2013 Tentang Keistimewaan Yogyakarta Dan Hukum Tanah Nasional. Arena Hukum, 9(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00902.4

Helmi, H., & Nurmandi, A. (2016). Dinamika Kelembagaan Dalam Pelekasana Otonomi Khusus Syariat Islam Di Aceh (Kajian Kelembagaan). Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 3(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.2016.0059

Husni, A. (2011). Hak-Hak Kolektif dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan (Suatu Analisis Mengenai Fungsi Hukum Dalam Konflik Pertan ahan ). MMH, 40(4), 419–426.

Moleong, L. J. (2005). Metode Penulisan Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosda.

Rahmatunnisa, M., Hindersah, R., & Achmad, T. H. (2018). Why Regions with Archipelagic Characteristics in Indonesia Also Need Asymmetric Decentralization? Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.251-261

Vani Wirawa. (2019). Kajian Tertib Administrasi Pertanahan Tanah Kasultanan dan Tanah Kadipaten Setelah Berlakunya Perdais Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6(2), 161–171.

Widianto, H. W. (2017). Tanah untuk Rakyat : Studi Fenomenologi Makna Penggusuran Penghuni Gumuk Pasir, Parangtritis. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/gov.v5i2.3985

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright Pusat Penelitian Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta


Pengunjung