PENERAPAN SCILAB sebagai FOSS dalam PERKULIAHAN di LINGKUNGAN TEKNIK ELEKTRO

Jemie Muliadi

Abstract


Makalah ini menyajikan penerapan perangkat lunak Scilab sebagai pendukung pengajaran dalam mata kuliah teknik, seperti Teknik Kendali dan Variabel Kompleks. Pembahasan difokuskan pada keunggulan dan wawasan yang relevan dalam pengajaran mata kuliah pada teknik elektro, khususnya dalam adopsi perangkat lunak bebas dan sumber terbuka (Free and Open Source Software/FOSS) dalam proses kuliah dalam kelas. Scilab, sebagai salah satu perangkat lunak FOSS, membawa berbagai keunggulan seperti berbiaya rendah, kemudahan aksesibilitas, dan kesempatan pengembangan lebih lanjut, sehingga menjadi alternatif yang menarik dibandingkan perangkat lunak propietary dalam pendidikan teknik. Dengan kapabilitas komputasi yang kuat dan kompatibilitas terhadap berbagai aplikasi teknik, Scilab menjadi aset strategis bagi institusi akademik yang tak ingin ketinggalan dalam pengkinian metode pengajaran dalam era disrupsi. Penerapan Scilab menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa akan memilih alat bantu pembelajaran yang gratis atau berbiaya rendah tanpa mengorbankan fungsionalitas, terutama dalam lingkungan belajar dengan sumber daya yang terbatas. Pemilihan ini sejalan dengan tren pendidikan digital yang menekankan keterjangkauan dan keterbukaan. Oleh karena itu, institusi pendidikan dan pengelola akademik didorong untuk mendukung integrasi FOSS seperti Scilab ke dalam kurikulum dan infrastruktur. Pemanfaatan Scilab dalam kegiatan pembelajaran di kelas dapat meningkatkan pemahaman konseptual, keterlibatan praktis, serta keterampilan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa.

Keywords


Kuliah Sistem Kendali, FOSS, Scilab, Xcos, Kuliah Teknik Kendali

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENSI

Nayak, K., & Binjha, P. B. (2022). Student’s awareness of free and open-source software (FOSS) in higher education. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 26(2), 81-87.

Ndaba, N. E., & Gedala, M. N. (2024). Digital transformation challenges in higher education institutions post COVID-19. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 8, 54-63.

Tomazin, M., & Gradisar, M. (2009, June). Cost-benefit analysis of free/open source software in education. In Proceedings of the ITI 2009 31st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (pp. 473-478). IEEE.

Peter, U. I., Orubebe, E. D., & Oladokun, B. D. (2024). Transforming Education in Nigerian Universities: The Role of Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS) in Teaching and Learning. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 13(1), 39-47

Muliadi, J., & Afrilionita, D. (2016). Encouraging the Innovation-Based Improvement of Teaching’s Methods by the Implementation of Engineering Working System for Continuous Professional Development. Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Education and Proffesional Development (InCoTePD), 2016, 288.

Muliadi, J. (2015). Investigating the Accuracy of BPPT Flying Wing UAV’s Linearized Equation of Motion Compared to BPPT-04C Sriti Flight Test Data, Proceeding of the 3 rd IndoMS International Conference on Mathematics and Its Applications (IICMA).

Muliadi, J. (2016). The Analysis of Unconventional Aircraft Flight Dynamics Model by Linearizing its Equation of Motion as Applied in BPPT’s V-Tail Configuration UAV Gagak, Proceeding of the Conference on Fundamental and Applied Science for Advanced Technology (ConFAST).

Mercier, E., Goldstein, M. H., Baligar, P., & Rajarathinam, R. J. (2023). Collaborative learning in engineering education. In International handbook of engineering education research (pp. 402-432). Routledge.

Fortunato, L., & Galassi, M. (2021). The case for free and open source software in research and scholarship. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2197), 20200079.

Ray, B., & Bhaskaran, R. (2013). Integrating simulation into the engineering curriculum: a case study. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 41(3), 269-280

Robertsone, G., & Lapiņa, I. (2023). Digital transformation as a catalyst for sustainability and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100017.

Wahyudi, M. N. A., Budiyanto, C. W., Widiastuti, I., Hatta, P., & bin Bakar, M. S. (2024). Understanding Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 7(2), 102-118.

(2022) Research & Education Need Open Tools for Knowledge Building & Sharing. Scilab Use Cases. [Online]. Available: http://www.scilab.org/

Gayoso Martínez, V., Hernández Encinas, L., Martín Muñoz, A., & Queiruga Dios, A. (2021). Using free mathematical software in engineering classes. Axioms, 10(4), 253.

Gomez, C., & Mannori, S. (2008, January). Scilab/Scicos: an open source platform for embedded real time systems development. In Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS2008).

Li, J., & Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis. PloS one, 19(12), e0316269.

Biswas, S., Benabentos, R., Brewe, E., Potvin, G., Edward, J., Kravec, M., & Kramer, L. (2022). Institutionalizing evidence-based STEM reform through faculty professional development and support structures. International journal of STEM education, 9(1), 36.

Azure, I., Wiredu, J. K., Musah, A., & Akolgo, E. (2023). AI-enhanced performance evaluation of python, matlab, and scilab for solving nonlinear systems of equations: A comparative study using the broyden method. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 13(04), 644-677.

Singh, P. (2024). Model-Based Systems Engineering for Engineering Education Systems Simulation (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida).

Bhola, J., Bhatnagar, M., & Soni, N. D. (2021).The Role of Simulation Tools in Blended Education Environment. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 11(03), 44-46.

Mikac, M., Logožar, R., & Horvatić, M. (2022). Performance Comparison of Open Source and Commercial Computing Tools in Educational and Other Use—Scilab vs. MATLAB. Tehnički glasnik, 16(4), 509-518.

Dias, C. G., Feitosa, N. T., & da Silva, L. C. (2020). The Use of Scilab-Cloud for Teaching Digital Signal Processing Concepts in Electrical Engineering Curricula. American Scientific Research Journal of Engineering, Technology and Sciences (ASRJETS), 74(1), 101-114..

Andreeva, H., Gabrova, R., & Kuzmanov, I. (2024). INTERACTIVE RESOURCE FOR IMAGE PROCESSING IN SCILAB. Journal of Hygienic Engineering & Design, 46(1).

Martínez, M. P., Guardarrama, J. R., Baranda, J. S., & Freire, R. C. S. (2022). Use of Scilab software as a didactic tool in electrical circuits laboratory practices. Ingeniería Energética, 43(3), 71-79.

Sharma, S. (2023). Virtual experiments of Physics using Scilab. Educational Trend (A Journal of RIE, Ajmer-NCERT), 4(1), 4-9.

Dibarbora, C. (2021, May). Computational models and experimental validation at the physics teacher training college using scilab and arduino™. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1882, No. 1, p. 012139). IOP Publishing.

Liu, Y., & Zhu, H. (2022). Simulation Experiment of 3D Digital Core Visual Modeling Based on SCILAB Software. Advances in Computer, Signals and Systems, 6(7), 18-23.

Martínez, L. C. J., Facio, J. T., Granados, R. A., Santos, R. R., & Hernández, A. R. C. (2025). Dynamic Simulation of a Non-linear CSTR Using Scilab/Xcos®: a Practical Approach for Chemical Engineering Education. TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua, 19(1), e1874-e1874.

Godlewski, M., & Rogowski, K. (2022). Data Acquisition and Control System Based on Scilab Software Environment. Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka, 26.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/jkte.v10i2.8767

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.