ANALISIS LIFE CYCLE COST PADA PENERAPAN KONSEP GREEN BUILDING UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN EFISIENSI ANGGARAN PUBLIK : STUDI KASUS PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH DINAS

Mahdika Putra Nanda, Mega Kurniawati

Abstract


Pembangunan rumah dinas sebagai aset publik pemerintah selama ini hanya mempertimbangkan biaya konstruksi awal (initial cost) tanpa memperhitungkan biaya jangka panjang. Pendekatan ini berpotensi mengakibatkan inefisiensi anggaran publik karena biaya operasional dan pemeliharaan yang tinggi sepanjang umur bangunan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis Life Cycle Cost (LCC) pada tiga skenario penerapan konsep green building dalam pembangunan rumah dinas guna mewujudkan efisiensi anggaran publik. Data primer bersumber dari Rencana Anggaran Biaya (RAB) pembangunan rumah dinas dua lantai senilai Rp 2,235 miliar. Analisis LCC dilakukan selama 30 tahun dengan discount rate 6%. Hasil analisis menunjukkan Skenario Green Building Dasar menghemat 11,07% dan Skenario Green Building Optimal menghemat 16,47% dari total LCC dibandingkan skenario konvensional. Break-even period dicapai pada tahun ke-18 dan ke-22, yang semakin memendek seiring kenaikan harga energi. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa investasi green building pada rumah dinas merupakan strategi efisiensi anggaran publik jangka panjang yang terukur dan berbasis bukti

Keywords


life cycle cost, green building, rumah dinas, efisiensi anggaran publik, rencana anggaran biaya

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anand, V., Kadiri, V. L., & Putcha, C. (2023). Passive buildings: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 4(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-022-00068-z

Andersen, C. E., Rasmussen, F. N., Habert, G., & Birgisdóttir, H. (2021). Embodied GHG Emissions of Wooden Buildings—Challenges of Biogenic Carbon Accounting in Current LCA Methods. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.729096

Dwaikat, L. N., & Ali, K. N. (2018). Green buildings life cycle cost analysis and life cycle budget development: Practical applications. Journal of Building Engineering, 18, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.015

Imran Khan, M., Bicer, Y., Asif, M., Al-Ansari, T. A., Khan, M., Kurniawan, T. A., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2024). The GCC’s path to a sustainable future: Navigating the barriers to the adoption of energy efficiency measures in the built environment. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 23, 100636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100636

Jamaludin, F. A. B., & Li, J. (2023). Research on low-carbon evaluation of green buildings based on the whole life cycle theory. SN Applied Sciences, 5(10), 262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05488-4

Krzywiński, K., & Sadowski, Ł. (2018). Life Cycle Cost Assessment and the Optimum Design of Timber Roofs for Sustainable Construction. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02257-0_15

Li, S., Lu, Y., Kua, H. W., & Chang, R. (2020). The economics of green buildings: A life cycle cost analysis of non-residential buildings in tropic climates. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119771

Li, X., Lin, M., Xie, W., Jim, C. Y., Lai, J., & Cheng, L. (2023). Holistic Life-cycle Cost-benefit Analysis of Green Buildings: A China Case Study. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 27(11), 4602–4621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0431-3

Masloman, M. U., & Nursin, A. (2021). Penerapan Green Construction Pada Proyek Pembangunan Tod Mahata Margonda. Construction and Material Journal, 3(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v3i1.3735

Miraj, P., Berawi, M. A., & Utami, S. R. (2021). Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost–benefit evaluation. Building Research & Information, 49(6), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.1896354

Prasetyawan, S., Machfudiyanto, R. A., & Rachmawati, T. S. N. (2023). Incentives and Barriers to Green Building Implementation: The Case of Jakarta. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.7150

Sutikno, S., Hardjomuljadi2, S., & Wiyanto3, H. (2025). Cost Model Development For Green Building Compliance With Indonesia’s Regulation No.21 Of 2021. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S6), 1442–1452. https://www.tpmap.org/

Utomo, C., Astarini, S. D., Rahmawati, F., Setijanti, P., & Nurcahyo, C. B. (2022). The Influence of Green Building Application on High-Rise Building Life Cycle Cost and Valuation in Indonesia. Buildings, 12(12), 2180. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122180

Weerasinghe, A. S., Ramachandra, T., & Rotimi, J. O. B. (2021). Comparative life-cycle cost (LCC) study of green and traditional industrial buildings in Sri Lanka. Energy and Buildings, 234, 110732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110732

Willar, D., Trigunarsyah, B., Supit, S., & Senduk, N. (2025). Implementing green construction to increase competitiveness: a case of the Indonesian local construction industry. CIB Conferences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/3067-4883.2067

Zekavot, M., Tahbaz, M., & Hafezi, M. R. (2023). A study on the payback period of building energy consumption optimization in different situations. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 14(4), 171–191.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/jkts.v11i1.9405

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Copyright Pusat Penelitian Fakultas Teknik

Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta