Analisis Kesehatan Finansial dan Going concern PT X dan PT Y di KAP T

Sitaresmi Amarita Nirina, Nurul Fitriani, Ferry Hendro Basuki

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the financial health and evaluate the going-concern status of PT X and PT Y using financial ratio analysis and the Modified Altman Z-Score model (1995). A descriptive quantitative approach was employed, utilizing secondary data specifically audited financial statements for the 2023–2025 period obtained during an internship at Public Accounting Firm (KAP) T. The analysis involved measuring liquidity, solvency, and profitability ratios, which were then integrated with Altman Z-Score calculations to identify potential financial distress. The results indicate that both companies maintained healthy financial conditions throughout the observation period. PT X demonstrated strengths in liquidity and capital structure, with a current ratio of 2,448% and a debt-to-equity ratio of 6%, whereas PT Y exhibited superior profitability performance, recording a return on assets of 9% and a net profit margin of 26%. Altman Z-Score calculations consistently placed both PT X and PT Y in the Safe Zone, with scores of 20.30 and 18.40, respectively, in 2025. These findings suggest that neither entity showed signs of financial distress or material uncertainty casting significant doubt on their ability to continue as a going concern, thereby supporting the issuance of an Unqualified Opinion. Practically, this study demonstrates that combining financial ratio analysis with the Altman Z-Score model serves as an effective analytical procedure to support going-concern evaluations in accordance with Auditing Standards.


Keywords


Financial Ratios; Going Concern; Financial Health; Altman Z-Score; Financial Statement Auditing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvin A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, & Chris E. Hogan. (2023). Auditing And Assurance Services. In Pearson Education Limited.

Cahyono, A., & Seputro, H. Y. (2025). Implementasi Standar Audit Dalam Proses Audit Laporan Keuangan Pada Kap. Community Development Journal : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(3), 4161–4173. https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v6i3.45777

Dade Nurdiniah. (2023). Liquidity, Profitability, Solvency and Going Concern Audit Opinion Acceptance: the Role of Firm Size As a Moderation. Berkala Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(2), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.20473/baki.v8i2.43269

De Haan, J. A. P., & Sari, M. R. (2023). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Journal of Emerging Business Management and Entrepreneurship Studies, 3(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.34149/jebmes.v3i2.133

Dea Elsani, Roza Fitrialis, Tika Rahmadani, Nayla Riska Vania, & Nur Fitriana. (2025). Analisis Rasio Keuangan dalam Menilai Kinerja Profitabilitas dan Likuiditas Perusahaan pada PT. Matahari Departement Store Periode 2023-2024. MENAWAN : Jurnal Riset Dan Publikasi Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(4), 259–269. https://journal.areai.or.id/index.php/MENAWAN/article/view/1687

Dila F., & Rahman A. (2022). Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan terhadap Pemberian Opini Audit Going Concern. Reviu Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Sistem Informasi, 1(1), 132–142.

Ega Aprioli Putri. (2021). Analisis Kinerja Keuanga PT. Mustika Ratu TBK Periode2016 - 2020. Skripsi, 8(3), 2886–2899.

Indira Shinta Dewi. (2022). Opini Audit Going Concern Dan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Liabilitas, 7(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.54964/liabilitas.v7i2.222

Karakolias, S. (2025). Rethinking financial distress in public healthcare: evidence from Greek hospitals’ governance attributes. Frontiers in Public Health, 13(September), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1690901

Retnosari, D., & Apriwenni, P. (2021). Opini Audit Going Concern: Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi. Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v10i1.797

Ross, S. A., & Westerfield, R. W. (2023). Essentials of Corporate Finance Ross. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Selly Tania, Leni Nur Pratiwi, & Banter Laksana. (2021). Prediksi Kebangkrutan Menggunakan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi pada PT Inti (Persero). Indonesian Journal of Economics and Management, 1(3), 628–633.

Tamara, D., Wardiyah, M. L., Islam, U., Sunan, N., Djati, G., Wetan, C., & Bandung, K. (2026). ANALISIS PENERAPAN PSAK 201 TENTANG PENYAJIAN. 4(6).

Wahyuni, R. K., Wijayanti, D., & Cahyadi, R. T. (2024). ANALISIS PENGARUH FAKTOR KEUANGAN TERHADAP OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN PADA PERUSAHAAN TERCATAT DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2017-2021. 8(1), 2024. https://doi.org/10.31092/subs.v8i1.2319

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (2021). Standar Audit (SA) 520: Prosedur Analitis. IAPI.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (2021). Standar Audit (SA) 570: Kelangsungan Usaha. IAPI.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (2021). Standar Audit (SA) 7000: Prosedur Perumusan Suatu Opini dan Pelaporan atas Laporan Keuangan . IAPI.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/map.v11i1.9690

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyrights of

Program Studi Akuntansi

Fakultas Ekonomi Bisnis & Ilmu Sosial

Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

 

ISSN (P) : 2355 - 9993

ISSN (E) : 2527 - 953X