Pharmacy Action Journal is committed to promoting scientific integrity, transparency, and constructive scholarly communication. The journal recognizes that scientific discussion and critical evaluation are essential components of the scholarly publishing process, even after an article has been formally published.
The journal welcomes post-publication discussions, including scholarly comments, critical analyses, methodological clarifications, and evidence-based responses concerning articles published in the journal.
1. Scope of Post-Publication Discussion
Post-publication discussions may address the following aspects:
-
Scientific validity, accuracy, and interpretation of published findings.
-
Research methodology, study design, and statistical analysis.
-
Reproducibility and reliability of research results.
-
Ethical considerations and research integrity.
-
Additional scientific evidence relevant to published articles.
-
Constructive academic criticism and clarification of published findings.
All discussions must be scientifically justified, objective, respectful, and relevant to the published article.
2. Submission of Comments
Readers, researchers, reviewers, and other members of the scientific community are encouraged to submit comments or questions regarding published articles.
Comments may be submitted to the editorial office through the journal's official contact email or through the OJS platform, where applicable.
Submissions should include the article title, author names, DOI or publication URL, a clear description of the issue being discussed, and relevant supporting evidence or references.
3. Editorial Assessment
All post-publication comments will be evaluated by the editorial team to determine their relevance, scientific merit, and compliance with publication ethics.
The editorial team reserves the right to request additional information, seek independent expert opinions, or invite the original authors to respond.
Comments containing personal attacks, discriminatory statements, unsupported allegations, or inappropriate language will not be considered for publication.
4. Author Response
Authors of published articles may be invited to provide a scientific response or clarification regarding issues raised through post-publication discussion.
The journal encourages authors to respond professionally, transparently, and with appropriate scientific evidence.
5. Corrections, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions
If post-publication discussions identify substantial errors, ethical concerns, or issues affecting the reliability of published findings, the editorial team will evaluate the matter in accordance with applicable publication ethics guidelines, including those of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Depending on the nature and severity of the issue, editorial actions may include:
-
Publication of a correction or clarification.
-
Publication of an expression of concern.
-
Retraction of the published article when warranted.
Any formal editorial action will be clearly identified and linked to the original publication to maintain transparency and the integrity of the scholarly record.
6. Transparency and Publication of Discussions
Post-publication comments and author responses may be published on the journal's website or as formal scholarly correspondence, subject to editorial evaluation.
Published discussions will be appropriately linked to the original article whenever technically feasible.
The editorial team is responsible for ensuring that post-publication discussions contribute constructively to scientific knowledge and do not compromise ethical standards.
7. Confidentiality and Ethical Considerations
The journal will handle sensitive information and allegations of research misconduct confidentially, as appropriate, during the investigation process.
Individuals participating in post-publication discussions are expected to disclose relevant conflicts of interest and adhere to professional standards of scholarly communication.
Pharmacy Action Journal is committed to maintaining an open, responsible, and ethical environment for post-publication scholarly discussion and continuous improvement of scientific publications.

